Supreme Court Lowers the Bar for ERISA Lawsuits
In Cunningham v. Cornell University, the Supreme Court ruled that plaintiffs bringing a claim under ERISA for a prohibited transaction are not required to plead the absence of a statutory exemption at the outset. The case involved allegations that Cornell’s 403(b) retirement plan paid its recordkeepers excessive fees — reportedly up to $200 per participant annually, compared to a claimed reasonable fee of $35 per participant.